Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2018 18:19:16 GMT
Senior members subject to senior moments...  |
|
|
|
Post by Carl on Jan 2, 2018 20:12:08 GMT
Senior members subject to senior moments... This is why the change is advisable, to transform senior moments into exalted ones. If other members become exalted, as Rene threatens, we can redefine it as "ordinary" while John Charles and I are propelled, ever humble, ever closer to legendary status.  |
|
|
|
Post by Carl on Jan 3, 2018 20:50:34 GMT
I humbly propose that "Senior Member" be changed to "Exalted Poobah" Carl, by all means, I'd be happy to! But then please realize that all Senior members will be exhalted to Poobah's! If you have more than 3 likes I will change it! Any other proposals?  Rene, So far no additional likes. Other members may be jealous or otherwise opposed to a noble upper stratum. / |
|
|
|
Post by René on Jan 4, 2018 0:10:49 GMT
Carl, by all means, I'd be happy to! But then please realize that all Senior members will be exhalted to Poobah's! If you have more than 3 likes I will change it! Any other proposals? Rene, So far no additional likes. Other members may be jealous or otherwise opposed to a noble upper stratum. / Yes, it seems. Lucio and Chris are the brave ones but others are still reticent. Obviously not a light-hearted decision to make... let's wait and see. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 7:49:50 GMT
We could call Carl and John Charles "emeritus members", to distinguish from us lowly posters. |
|
|
|
Post by robmarsh on Jan 4, 2018 8:00:48 GMT
Member Emeritus for Charles and Carl
Contributing Member for those over a hundred posts
Junior member for those under a hundred posts
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamie on Jan 4, 2018 10:11:09 GMT
We could call Carl and John Charles "emeritus members", to distinguish from us lowly posters. That puts them in the ‘Ecclestone’ club 😱 |
|
|
|
Post by René on Jan 4, 2018 11:20:32 GMT
Guys, this is all big fun and as I said to Carl I am more than willing to implement this. But just to be clear, I cannot give individual posters a ranking. The ranking is always linked to the number of posts. What I can change is A) the names of the rankings and B) the number of posts needed to achieve a certain status. I can also change the colours of the stars by the way. Please see attached a screenshot of the Settings panel, this gives an idea of the possibilities. So shoot your ideas and we'll find a good compromise! |
|
|
|
Post by robmarsh on Jan 4, 2018 11:30:03 GMT
I am really quite happy that they remain as they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl on Jan 4, 2018 16:45:48 GMT
I am really quite happy that they remain as they are. I never wanted to be a poobah and see no reason to change anything. I have an idea how Victor Frankenstein felt when the monster was out and about. |
|
|
|
Post by Carl on Jan 4, 2018 16:49:12 GMT
We could call Carl and John Charles "emeritus members", to distinguish from us lowly posters. That puts them in the ‘Ecclestone’ club 😱 In that case, never mind!  |
|
|
|
Post by Carl on Jan 4, 2018 16:55:00 GMT
We could call Carl and John Charles "emeritus members", to distinguish from us lowly posters. John Charles yes, but I am more court jester. No alteration of the proper ideals of liberty / fraternity / equality is called for. |
|
|
|
Post by Carl on Jan 4, 2018 17:03:51 GMT
Member Emeritus for Charles and Carl Contributing Member for those over a hundred posts Junior member for those under a hundred posts This is maybe too honorary for prolific posters young at heart and in spirit. May I suggest simply "Member" instead of "Senior Member"? |
|
|
|
Post by charleselan on Jan 4, 2018 17:04:49 GMT
No King Arthur needed on this round table, let us all be Knights . |
|
|
|
Post by charleselan on Jan 4, 2018 17:31:59 GMT
Having just looked at René post showing the settings, I like the fact that at 500 comments one becomes a "God". That is indeed something to aim for; a God like status . |
|
